

Always On VPN is Microsoft’s answer to secure, always-connected remote access. It automatically connects Windows devices to corporate resources without user action. While convenient, it can be complex to deploy and troubleshoot, and it mainly focuses on Windows environments.
If you’re looking for an Always On VPN alternative or wondering how it compares to DirectAccess and OpenVPN, this guide gives you clear answers. We’ll cover:
What Always On VPN does well and where it struggles.
How it stacks up against DirectAccess and OpenVPN.
What to look for in an Always On VPN alternative.
A quick decision guide to help you choose the right solution.

Always On VPN keeps remote Windows devices connected to internal company resources whenever there’s an internet connection. It supports:
Automatic connection before login – users don’t have to start the VPN manually.
Split or forced tunneling – IT can decide what traffic goes through the VPN.
Certificate-based authentication – secure identity validation.
Windows focused: Works best for Windows 10/11; limited for macOS, Linux, or mobile-heavy environments.
Complex setup: Requires Active Directory, PKI, and a mobile device management (MDM) solution.
Troubleshooting issues: Certificate errors and network policy conflicts can block access.
If you’re exploring other VPN options, check out VPN Test for unbiased reviews and recommendations tailored to your needs.
Many organizations face similar issues with Always On VPN and traditional VPN solutions:
Complex setup: Requires Active Directory, certificate management, and MDM solutions.
Performance issues: High latency and connection drops, especially for remote workers.
Limited device support: Works best on Windows and can be challenging for BYOD or mobile users.
Scaling challenges: Legacy VPN infrastructure struggles with sudden spikes in remote work.
These challenges push many IT teams to explore simpler, more secure alternatives. Before choosing a VPN or alternative, it’s smart to measure actual speeds. Use the freeVPN speed test tool to see how providers perform in your region.
DirectAccess was Microsoft’s earlier remote access solution. It also offered automatic, always-on connectivity but had known scalability and flexibility issues. Microsoft now recommends Always On VPN as its replacement.
Feature | DirectAccess | Always On VPN |
OS Support | Windows Enterprise only | Windows 10/11 Pro/Enterprise/Education |
Authentication | Kerberos + Certificates | Certificates + MFA options |
Tunneling | IPv6 transition technologies | IKEv2, SSTP, L2TP options |
Future Support | Legacy, no new development | Current Microsoft standard |
Bottom line: If you’re still using DirectAccess, Always On VPN or another modern solution is the recommended move.
OpenVPN is a widely used open-source VPN solution. It’s designed for flexibility and cross-platform compatibility.
Deployment: Always On VPN is native to Windows but requires deep integration with AD and certificates. OpenVPN is easier to deploy across Windows, macOS, Linux, and mobile.
Security: Both are secure. Always On VPN benefits from Windows integration and policy control, while OpenVPN’s open-source model allows external auditing and customization.
Performance: Always On VPN (with IKEv2) often outperforms OpenVPN on Windows. However, OpenVPN works well when you need to support multiple device types.
Bottom line: Choose Always On VPN for Windows-centric networks. Choose OpenVPN for mixed-device environments or when you want open-source flexibility.
Traditional VPNs create a single secure tunnel between the user and the network. While it works, it has weaknesses:
Users gain broad access, which can increase risk.
Performance drops due to data backhauling.
Complex management for IT teams.
Modern work needs faster, safer, and easier solutions.
How it works: Instead of connecting you to the whole network, ZTNA connects you only to the apps you need. Access is based on your identity, device, and location.
Why it’s better:
No full network exposure.
Built-in support for multi-factor authentication.
Lower risk of lateral movement attacks.
How it works: SASE combines networking and security in the cloud. It gives users secure access to apps and data from anywhere, using one platform.
Why it’s better:
Low latency with global cloud points of presence.
Integrated threat protection and data security.
Ideal for remote and hybrid teams.
How it works: SDP hides your infrastructure completely. Only authorized devices and users can even see your apps.
Why it’s better:
Prevents unauthorized scanning or discovery of your network.
More control over who sees and connects to resources.
How it works: Instead of giving access to the network, these tools let users connect directly to specific applications.
Why it’s better:
Simple and focused: users only see the apps they need.
No VPN client software required in most cases.
If your goal is secure remote access without VPN headaches, consider ZTNA, SASE, SDP, or app-specific gateways. They reduce risk, are easier to manage, and are designed for today’s hybrid workforce.
If Always On VPN doesn’t meet your needs, here’s what to look for in an alternative:
ZTNA connects users to applications instead of the whole network. It uses identity and context (device type, location) to grant access, reducing the attack surface.
For mixed environments (Windows, Mac, Linux, iOS, Android), consider solutions like OpenVPN or commercial cloud-based VPNs that support all OS types.
Modern solutions like SASE-based remote access or managed VPNs can provide seamless connections without the complex AD and certificate requirements of Always On VPN.
Choose providers with global points of presence (POP) or edge gateways to keep latency low for remote users.
If you currently use DirectAccess → move to Always On VPN or a Zero Trust alternative.
If you run a Windows-only environment → Always On VPN is good, but consider ZTNA if you want simpler management.
If you support multiple operating systems → choose OpenVPN or a cloud-based VPN solution.
If you want to avoid VPN complexity entirely → choose a Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) solution.
Still unsure which solution to choose? Use this VPN comparison tool to compare features and pricing side by side.
Plan in phases: Test with a small group before full rollout.
Run systems in parallel: Keep the old VPN active until the new solution is proven stable.
Communicate with users: Clear instructions reduce support calls.
Audit and remove old access: Once complete, retire old VPN servers to reduce security risks.
Always On VPN improves on Microsoft’s older DirectAccess, but it’s not the only option. OpenVPN offers flexible, cross-platform access, while Zero Trust solutions provide even more granular, identity-based security.
Choosing the right solution depends on your environment:
Windows-only networks → Always On VPN or ZTNA.
Mixed-device teams → OpenVPN or a managed VPN.
Modern security goals → Zero Trust solutions.
Take time to map your user needs, security requirements, and IT capacity before choosing. A well-fitted remote access solution keeps your workforce secure and productive without unnecessary complexity.
Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) is one of the best alternatives. It allows secure, identity-based access to apps without connecting users to the full network, reducing security risks and improving performance.
Yes, Always On VPN offers better compatibility with cloud and mobile devices compared to DirectAccess, which is limited to domain-joined Windows clients. However, both still use traditional VPN models, which is why many organizations move to ZTNA or SASE.
Traditional VPNs often slow down connections, expose the network to potential attacks, and require complex management. Modern alternatives focus on app-level access, better security, and cloud-native performance.
Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) is a security framework that gives users access only to specific applications they need, based on identity and context. Unlike VPNs, it never exposes the full network, making it more secure.
Yes. Many IT teams run the old VPN and the new solution in parallel during the migration phase, moving users in batches to ensure uninterrupted connectivity.
Yes. Most VPN alternatives are designed for remote and hybrid workforces. They provide secure access to apps and data from anywhere, often with lower latency and easier device support.
Not necessarily. Many cloud-based alternatives remove the need for physical hardware and complex management, often lowering total costs over time.

Content Specialist with expertise in cybersecurity and online privacy. Sarah has been testing and reviewing VPN services for over 5 years and regularly contributes to leading tech publications.
View all articles by VPNTest →Subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest VPN guides, security tips, and industry news directly in your inbox.